🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I usually avoided extensive use of randomization during my tabletop roleplaying games. I tended was for story direction and session development to be determined by character actions as opposed to the roll of a die. However, I decided to change my approach, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Seeing an Improvised Tool

A popular podcast features a DM who often asks for "luck rolls" from the players. The process entails picking a specific dice and assigning potential outcomes tied to the roll. This is at its core no unlike rolling on a random table, these are devised in the moment when a player's action has no obvious outcome.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own table, mainly because it appeared interesting and provided a change from my standard routine. The outcome were eye-opening, prompting me to think deeply about the perennial tension between planning and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable In-Game Example

During one session, my group had just emerged from a city-wide conflict. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two beloved NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. Instead of deciding myself, I let the dice decide. I instructed the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: a low roll, both were killed; a middling roll, only one would die; a high roll, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a profoundly emotional moment where the party came upon the corpses of their allies, forever holding hands in their final moments. The cleric performed last rites, which was uniquely meaningful due to previous roleplaying. In a concluding touch, I improvised that the forms were strangely restored, showing a magical Prayer Bead. By chance, the bead's magical effect was perfectly what the party needed to solve another pressing situation. It's impossible to plan such perfect story beats.

Honing DM Agility

This experience caused me to question if randomization and spontaneity are in fact the essence of this game. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt need exercise. Players frequently find joy in upending the most detailed plans. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and invent scenarios on the fly.

Employing luck rolls is a great way to train these skills without venturing too far outside your usual style. The key is to apply them for minor decisions that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. To illustrate, I would avoid using it to establish if the main villain is a secret enemy. Instead, I would consider using it to figure out if the PCs enter a room just in time to see a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Player Agency

Spontaneous randomization also helps keep players engaged and foster the impression that the game world is responsive, evolving according to their choices as they play. It reduces the perception that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole story, thereby enhancing the shared aspect of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been part of the game's DNA. The game's roots were reliant on charts, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. Although current D&D frequently prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the required method.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

Absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. However, it's also fine no issue with relinquishing control and allowing the rolls to guide minor details instead of you. Direction is a big part of a DM's job. We require it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, in situations where doing so might improve the game.

The core suggestion is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Embrace a little randomness for inconsequential outcomes. The result could find that the surprising result is significantly more rewarding than anything you would have pre-written by yourself.